Press & Events
Friday, Sept. 18, 6-9 p.m. By Sherry Long slong@timesleader.com
KINGSTON – Home Rule Study Commission member Walter Griffith said he plans to file a lawsuit against the Luzerne
County Home Rule Study Commission after he repeatedly told fellow commissioners during Wednesday’s meeting he believed
they were violating the state’s Sunshine Act. Griffith vowed not to attend another commission meeting until the issue was resolved over whether the commission is regulated
by the Sunshine Law or the Home Rule Law. He believes because the commission violated the Sunshine Law by not legally advertising its meetings and holding a closed-door
meeting at the end of Wednesday’s session to discuss personnel matters. “I think the commission has held three illegal meetings. The opinion of the Department of Community and Economic
Development is that the meetings be advertised,” Griffith said during the regularly scheduled meeting. Commission Chairman Jim Haggerty disagreed with Griffith. Haggerty, a lawyer and Kingston mayor, said the real question
is whether the commission is considered an agency because the Sunshine Law only applies to agencies. “The Home Rule and Optional Plans Law and the Sunshine Law are contradictory in several important aspects,”
Haggerty said, adding that the commission has many obligations that are not under the Sunshine Law. The commission has not purchased any advertisements because the commission has no money. The commission is funded through
donations and the Luzerne County commissioners. The commission is expecting to receive funding approval from commissioners
in mid-July, but until then it has no operating funds. Haggerty suggested the commission get an opinion on the matter from a solicitor it plans to hire when it has the money. The majority of other commissioner members agreed with him, as they voted 9 to 2, to seek the advice of a solicitor to
determine which law governs the commission. Griffith and board Treasurer Rick Morelli voted against the measure. Morelli said it would be best “to take the cautious
way” and follow the Sunshine Law guidelines. Morelli noted previous commissions have followed the Sunshine Law guidelines.
Haggerty noted that the Sunshine Law says meetings must be advertised, but the newspapers have printed articles in advance
noting when the meetings will be held. The Budget Committee, Vice-Chairman Veronica Ciaruffoli, Haggerty and Morelli met earlier Wednesday with county Commissioner
Maryanne Petrilla, County Chief Clerk/Manager Doug Pape and County Budget/Finance Chief Tom Pribula to discuss getting funding for the commission. County leaders decided to pay for future advertisements for the commission until its budget is approved. Griffith also believes the commission violated the Sunshine Law Wednesday night when it held a closed-door meeting to discuss
hiring a clerical assistant. After the regularly scheduled meeting the commission held a closed-door meeting to discuss the clerical assistant position.
After reconvening the public meeting, the commission voted on two nominations for men seeking the post after reconvening in
a public meeting. Jeffrey Niemiec was hired. The commission was well within its bounds to hold the private meeting because the Home Rule Law and Sunshine Law allows
the group to hold these meetings to conduct business necessary to get information needed to study how the county government
operates, Haggerty said. Private hearings can be held for any reason – in instance to hear from a whistleblower. “It is a tool to get honest and candid testimony that might not otherwise be available,” Haggerty said. The Sunshine Law allows executive sessions to be held under five instances – including personnel, real estate and
litigation issues.
By Jennifer Learn-Andes jandes@timesleader.com Members of Luzerne County’s newly elected Home Rule Study Commission gathered in the same room for the first time
Thursday to be sworn in by county President Judge Chester Muroski. Christopher Kersey signs papers after Judge Chester Muroski administered the oath to members of the Government
Study Commission on Thursday afternoon. AIMEE DILGER/The Times Leader Muroski instructed the 11 members to sit in the jury box, saying they are the jury elected to decide the future of county
government. The commission members are: Jim Haggerty, Walter Griffith Jr., John Adonizio, Veronica Ciaruffoli, Frank E. P. Conyngham,
Jack Schumacher, Rick Morelli, Richard “Kick” Heffron, Robert “Whammer” Wanyo, Christopher “C.
J.” Kersey and Charmaine Maynard. Muroski used the opportunity to raise some “issues of concern” about home rule. He said decisions on the government form and reorganization of row offices should be based on the effectiveness of the
office – not the current elected officials. Even if the commission opts to make substantial change, elected officials will still be needed to run county government,
he noted. “Please remember, any form of government is only as good as the individuals elected to implement it,” Muroski
said. Determining whether county leaders are elected at large or by regions will be another “paramount decision,”
he said. Election by region would be the most difficult choice because geographic territories would have to be carved out, he said. “I believe strong consideration should be given to keep the districts’ population as numerically equal as possible.
However, this is left exclusively and completely to your consideration,” Muroski said. A plan to recall or remove elected officials from office should also receive “important consideration,” he
said. The commission is deciding whether the third class County Code meets the needs of today’s citizens, he said. He cautioned
that changes can’t conflict with other state or federal laws. For example, another law requires the county to have an Election Board, so a new government form couldn’t eliminate
it, he said. The commission may propose the use of public referendums to make some decisions, rather than leaving them up to elected
officials. Muroski said he believes referendums should be left for “only issues of great public concern.” “Be careful. Do not turn Luzerne County into a California, where constant propositions are placed on the ballot and
the state’s paralyzed until the election results come in,” he said. The charter should also include a “reasonable” procedure for amendments so it may be altered to meet the needs
of future generations, Muroski said. He closed by giving commission members the same instructions he gives jurors before he releases them to deliberate, asking
them to respect fellow members and their views. After the oath in Muroski’s courtroom, commission members held a reception at the Ramada Inn in Wilkes-Barre. Commission members plan to hold their first meeting at 7 p.m. Wednesday at Wyoming Seminary, but the exact location at
the school has not yet been determined. The commission will have up to nine months to decide whether to proceed with a charter and, if so, another nine months
to draft a plan for a new, customized form of government. Voters ultimately decide whether to accept the charter. The charter must be completed 13 weeks before an election, which
means a charter change would likely be on the ballot in the November 2010 general election. Passage of a charter could be more difficult if it’s delayed to 2011 because that’s a county commissioner election
year. Commissioner contenders could actively campaign against a charter. Commissioner Greg Skrepenak and former commissioner Todd Vonderheid opposed the last proposed charter when they ran for commissioner in 2003, urging
the voters to give them a chance to turn around the county without home rule. That charter was defeated by a margin of 54
percent to 46 percent.
LUZERNE COUNTY CONTROLLER By Jennifer Learn-Andes jandes@timesleader.com Citizen watchdog Walter Griffith now has a shot to become the official watchdog of Luzerne County government. The 54-year-old auto repair shop owner from Wilkes-Barre won the Republican county controller nomination, according
to unofficial results. He will face Democrat Bob Morgan, a financial consultant from Fairview Township, in the Nov. 3 general
election. “I’m just ecstatic. I’m absolutely humbled that Republicans put their faith in me,” Griffith said
Tuesday night while celebrating at the county Republican headquarters. Griffith received 5,327 votes in a tight challenge against four contenders, based on unofficial results. The vote tally
for the others: former county commissioner Edward Brominski, Swoyersville, 3,992; certified public accountant Alice Coffman,
Sugarloaf Township, 3,490; attorney Nanda Palissery, Dallas, 2,989; and self-employed mortgage consultant Robert Sypniewski,
Dallas, 2,526. Morgan, 46, received 21,960 votes. Griffith stressed in his campaign that he was the only candidate who has been actively engaged in county government meetings
in recent years, demonstrating his willingness to ask “the tough questions.” Griffith has said he often shut down his business – Rutter Auto Service in Nanticoke – to attend county government
meetings. He has made arrangements for someone else to operate the business if he’s elected because he has pledged to
be in the controller’s office full time during business hours. He promised to be outspoken if elected, saying he’s frustrated when controllers sit silently at public meetings. “I think people saw my heart and desire to represent the people,” he said Tuesday. Morgan said he wants to run an “issue-oriented, high-level campaign” for the general election. “We want to focus on who brings the most experience to the table. I have 20 years of financial service experience
that will help the county in this time of need,” Morgan said. Currently assistant vice president/senior financial consultant with PNC Investments in Wilkes-Barre, Morgan has also managed
large corporate 401(k) plans for Prudential Investments and worked at Smith Barney. That experience is “extremely important,” he said, because the controller helps to oversee the $150 million
employee pension fund, which has required increasing taxpayer subsidy to stay afloat. Morgan said he wants the controller’s office to audit all county agencies, not just the row offices. Morgan and Griffith promise to hold quarterly public informational meetings and pack the county Web site with county fiscal
information. “Too often we’ve seen office holders who are insulated and isolated,” Morgan said Tuesday. “I want
to improve the relationship with the public.” Griffith praised his opponents for running a clean campaign and said he looks forward to debating issues with Morgan in
coming months. The county has been without an elected controller since Maryanne Petrilla became a county commissioner in January 2008. The controller serves for four years and received $36,562 annually. The controller is supposed to refuse payment if transactions
aren’t legal or properly approved. The controller has a powerful vote on the Salary Board, which creates all county
jobs and sets salaries for non-union positions. The controller even has some authority to investigate, issue subpoenas and withhold payments on suspicion of fraud, flagrant
abuse of public office or criminal acts, according to state law. Walter Griffith addressed the Commissioners regarding the
waste of Taxpayers money on outside attorneys Commissioners also unanimously voted Thursday to hire the Rosenn Jenkins & Greenwald law firm for $200 an hour to represent
the county assessment appeals board in a property assessment mediation challenge filed by Hanover Township resident Vic Kopko. Kopko also plans to file a lawsuit attempting to throw out the county’s reassessment. Taxpayer Walter Griffith, who won the
Republican nomination in the county controller race, asked commissioners why outside counsel is needed when the county has
several staff solicitors. The commissioners said assessment appeal board solicitor David Schwager is the only staff attorney who may handle the case
by law because Kopko’s action is against the appeal board. However, Schwager is busy processing assessment mediations,
and commissioners said they thought it would be unfair to put mediations on hold so he could focus on the Kopko matter.
Citizens of Luzerne County on Tuesday November 3rd Walter L Griffith JR. has been there
every day and at County Meetings for the past 3 years and not just at election Time. Walter Griffith JR. is a true Taxpayer
Advocate and not a person that will be there when it is profitable for him, but will be there “Full Time” to represent
“YOU” in the County Controller’s Office. On Nov 3rd Vote for a true “Voice of Honesty
and Integrity” and a person that will never forget, the Citizens of Luzerne County that placed
their trust in him, after Election Day. Elect Walter L. Griffith JR. for Luzerne County Controller
Walter L Griffith JR
for Walter Griffith has been active in all
levels of government since 2003 when he became involved in the Wilkes-Barre City Council election. Walter has been at mostly
every City Council meeting since becoming involved in 2003 and has been there to make criticisms and recommendations to make
your government accountable and more efficient and has done this by always trying to do the research and being prepared for
the meetings to represent each and every taxpayer in the City of Walter
Griffith has also been at most County Commissioner meetings and Salary Board and Prison Board meetings, since 2007 when the
County Government was exposed as having “Debit Card” misuse and was also at all the meetings concerning the recent
Luzerne County Property Reassessment and the Flood Authority Board concerning the recent Levee Fee and has also represented
the taxpayers in County Court regarding the borrowing of money for a mismanaged budget shortfall. Walter Griffith has asked the tough
questions of the Walter Griffith will be a “Full
Time” Controller as well, and will be accessible to all the Citizens of Luzerne County, in his office every day from
9 to 5, just like the taxpayers expect from their elected officials. Walter Griffith has demonstrated time
and time again that he is a person of Honesty and integrity and has never turned his back on the people of Urban questions need for New York City trips in ’06 and ’07BY MICHAEL P. BUFFER
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|